
Meg Whitman, founder of Ebay, has announced her intention to run for the Governor of California. That doesn’t sound stupid until you hear her talk about what she intends to do for California. She is so concerned about job losses in the state that she wants to gut the environmental protections and workers rights. Not to mention that she’s had ZERO political interest in the past and now, when it suits her, she wants to come and have us elect her. In fact she couldn’t even be troubled to cast her vote during any election in the past 20 years. Her qualifications? She’s wealthy, she’s rich and she’s got a lot of money.
Here are some bullet points from her website:
- Cut taxes to give businesses the incentive to invest, expand and hire more workers in California
Isn’t that trickle-down economics? Why can’t we get rid of this crappy idea? Business already skirts so many taxes that they might as well pay nothing at all. How much more can we cut the rules that they already avoid? Why not, it’s not her kids going into the grinder.
- Streamline regulations and modify workplace rules to ensure California is more competitive than other states
What she means here is get rid of worker protections that people have actually died for. Why not, it’s not her kids going into the grinder. Thanks, but no thanks Meg! I like my 40-hour work week, thank you very much.
- Build a world-class infrastructure to meet the water, energy and transportation demands of a 21st century California
With what taxes? You gave that away and then, like Arnold before you, will have to go on TV and talk about how everyone has to do their part. Everyone except you and your family that is. What she’s alluding to here is that you’ll get loads of water for the Central Valley for agriculture, and your screwed if you’re a salmon.
- Reduce the cost of energy, create a reliable transmission system and make our state more energy independent
The big lie of nuclear energy. It’s not cheap. It’s not clean. It’s not safe! Just ask Tony Benn and he’ll tell you all about it.
- Establish incentives for businesses and residents to find creative and cost-effective ways to reduce environmental impacts
Are the things that are cost effective the ONLY things worth doing? I’m all for creativity, but not for bullshit like this bullet point.
- Fully analyze the effects of environmental regulations on jobs, business and their intended environmental goals
We have done impact studies out the wazoo already. What she’s saying here is that she wants to get rid of as many of these regulations as possible. Just like all Republicans, if she is one, she espouses that regulation got us where we are today. This is nonsense.
- Place a moratorium on most AB 32 regulations until our economy recovers and the state understands their effect on jobs, consumers, productivity and the economy
We didn’t just womp up an environmental law like this. People had input and it is necessary now, not later. That’s worth repeating, NOW NOT LATER!
Meg Whitman, didn’t she run eBay? eBay is cool, therefore she must be really smart and able to deal with our problems as a state right? Wrong! Expertise in one area, if you agree she does indeed have that expertise to begin with, is not transferable to another area. Take for instance a conversation that I had with a programmer friend of mine about AIDS victims. He said that it would be far cheaper to round up all of the people who suffer from AIDS and put them on an island in order to care for them. Economies of scale and all that jazz. Yes, it would be cheaper if you could magically make it happen; however, you’d lose a bit of your humanity in the bargain by doing something so monstrous. I’m not suggesting that she’s a monster,– I’m more flat out saying it,– but the point is that her alleged competence in business does in no way makes her qualified to be Governor of the state of California. Look at what a disaster Arnold has been.
George Carlin used to talk about what labels like ‘Chocolaty’ mean- ” In this case it means no fucking chocolate.” In the case of Meg Whitman, when she says that she’s for the environment when the time is right, it means that she’d personally strangle a sea otter if you gave her twenty bucks. That’s it and boy is it stupid.